#102985: "Skirmish is correctly called a tie"
Miről szól ez a jelentés?
Mi történt? Kérünk, válassz az alábbiakból
Mi történt? Kérünk, válassz az alábbiakból
Kérjük ellenőrizd, hogy nincs-e azonos tárggyal már jelentés!
Ha igen, kérjük SZAVAZZ erre a jelentésre! A legtöbb szavazattal rendelkező jelentéssel kiemelt PRIORITÁSSAL foglalkozunk
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Részletes leírás
-
• Kérjük másold be a hiba üzenetet, amit kaptál, ha volt ilyen.
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" -
• Kérjük mondd el, hogy mit szerettél volna csinálni, mit csináltál és mi történt
114
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
-
• Kérjük, másold az angolul megjelenített szöveget, ahelyett, hogy lefordítanád a Te nyelvedre! Ha van erről a hibáról képernyőképed (ami ajánlott), bármilyen képfeltöltő oldalra feltöltheted (snipboard.io például) a feltöltéshez másold ki a linket és illeszd be ide. Létezik ez a szöveg a fordítási rendszerben? Ha igen, több mint 24 órája lett lefordítva?
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
-
• Kérjük magyarázd el a javaslatodat pontosan és tömören, hogy amennyire lehet, könnyen érthető legyen, mire is gondolsz!
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
-
• Mit láttál a képernyőn, amikor blokkolva lettél? (Üres képernyő? A játék felületének egy részét? Hiba üzenet?)
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
-
• A szabályok melyik részét nem vette figyelembe a BGA adaptáció
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" -
• Ez a szabály áthágása látható a visszajátszásban? Ha igen, melyik lépésszámnál?
114
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
-
• Melyik játékbeli akciót akartad csinálni, amikor a hiba előjött?
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" -
• Mit akartál csinálni, hogy ezt a játékbeli akciót elindíthasd?
114
-
• Mi történt amikor megpróbáltad ezt (hiba üzenet, játék státusz üzenet, ...)?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
-
• A játék melyik lépésénél lépett fel a probléma? (mi volt a kiírt utasítás?)
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" -
• Mi történt amikor megpróbáltad ezt az akciót (hiba üzenet, játék státusz üzenet, ...)?
114
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
-
• Kérjük, írd le a megjelenítési hibát! Ha van erről a hibáról képernyőképed (ami ajánlott), bármilyen képfeltöltő oldalra feltöltheted (snipboard.io például) a feltöltéshez másold ki a linket és illeszd be ide.
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
-
• Kérjük, másold az angolul megjelenített szöveget, ahelyett, hogy lefordítanád a Te nyelvedre! Ha van erről a hibáról képernyőképed (ami ajánlott), bármilyen képfeltöltő oldalra feltöltheted (snipboard.io például) a feltöltéshez másold ki a linket és illeszd be ide. Létezik ez a szöveg a fordítási rendszerben? Ha igen, több mint 24 órája lett lefordítva?
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
-
• Kérjük magyarázd el a javaslatodat pontosan és tömören, hogy amennyire lehet, könnyen érthető legyen, mire is gondolsz!
Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.
The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.
This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish" • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v118
Bejelentés előzmények
"Skirmish ISN'T a tie but "
changed to
"Skirmish is correctly called a tie"
Hozzáadni valamit a jelentéshez
- Másik asztal ID / lépés ID
- az F5 megoldotta a problémát?
- Milyen gyakran jön elő a probléma? Minden alkalommal? Véletlenszerűen?
- Ha van erről a hibáról képernyőképed (ami ajánlott), bármilyen képfeltöltő oldalra feltöltheted (snipboard.io például) a feltöltéshez másold ki a linket és illeszd be ide.
