#169328: "Adela effects resolved in the wrong order"
Miről szól ez a jelentés?
Mi történt? Kérünk, válassz az alábbiakból
Mi történt? Kérünk, válassz az alábbiakból
Kérjük ellenőrizd, hogy nincs-e azonos tárggyal már jelentés!
Ha igen, kérjük SZAVAZZ erre a jelentésre! A legtöbb szavazattal rendelkező jelentéssel kiemelt PRIORITÁSSAL foglalkozunk
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Részletes leírás
-
• Kérjük másold be a hiba üzenetet, amit kaptál, ha volt ilyen.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Kérjük mondd el, hogy mit szerettél volna csinálni, mit csináltál és mi történt
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
-
• Kérjük, másold az angolul megjelenített szöveget, ahelyett, hogy lefordítanád a Te nyelvedre! Ha van screenshot-od erről a bugról (ajánlott), használd a Imgur.com, hogy feltöltsd, majd másold be a linket.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Létezik ez a szöveg a fordítási rendszerben? Ha igen, több mint 24 órája lett lefordítva?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
-
• Kérjük magyarázd el a javaslatodat pontosan és tömören, hogy amennyire lehet, könnyen érthető legyen, mire is gondolsz!
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
-
• Mit láttál a képernyőn, amikor blokkolva lettél? (Üres képernyő? A játék felületének egy részét? Hiba üzenet?)
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
-
• A szabályok melyik részét nem vette figyelembe a BGA adaptáció
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Ez a szabály áthágása látható a visszajátszásban? Ha igen, melyik lépésszámnál?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
-
• Melyik játékbeli akciót akartad csinálni, amikor a hiba előjött?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Mit akartál csinálni, hogy ezt a játékbeli akciót elindíthasd?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
-
• Mi történt amikor megpróbáltad ezt (hiba üzenet, játék státusz üzenet, ...)?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
-
• A játék melyik lépésénél lépett fel a probléma? (mi volt a kiírt utasítás?)
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Mi történt amikor megpróbáltad ezt az akciót (hiba üzenet, játék státusz üzenet, ...)?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
-
• Kérjük, írd le a megjelenítési hibát! Ha van screenshot-od erről a bugról (ajánlott), használd a Imgur.com, hogy feltöltsd, majd másold be a linket.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
-
• Kérjük, másold az angolul megjelenített szöveget, ahelyett, hogy lefordítanád a Te nyelvedre! Ha van screenshot-od erről a bugról (ajánlott), használd a Imgur.com, hogy feltöltsd, majd másold be a linket.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Létezik ez a szöveg a fordítási rendszerben? Ha igen, több mint 24 órája lett lefordítva?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
-
• Kérjük magyarázd el a javaslatodat pontosan és tömören, hogy amennyire lehet, könnyen érthető legyen, mire is gondolsz!
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
does not matter
Bejelentés előzmények
Actually, all players as in multiplayer state. I will change for all opponents and after a special state for the active player
It's technically not a bug since the player can only wait the others players to discard but in turn based game, it's not really interesting.
Thanks :)
Hozzáadni valamit a jelentéshez
- Másik asztal ID / lépés ID
- az F5 megoldotta a problémát?
- Milyen gyakran jön elő a probléma? Minden alkalommal? Véletlenszerűen?
- Ha van screenshot-od erről a bugról (ajánlott), használd a Imgur.com, hogy feltöltsd, majd másold be a linket.
