#17548: "not feeding the meeples at all gives an unfair advantage"
Miről szól ez a jelentés?
Mi történt? Kérünk, válassz az alábbiakból
Mi történt? Kérünk, válassz az alábbiakból
Kérjük ellenőrizd, hogy nincs-e azonos tárggyal már jelentés!
Ha igen, kérjük SZAVAZZ erre a jelentésre! A legtöbb szavazattal rendelkező jelentéssel kiemelt PRIORITÁSSAL foglalkozunk
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Részletes leírás
-
• Kérjük másold be a hiba üzenetet, amit kaptál, ha volt ilyen.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Kérjük mondd el, hogy mit szerettél volna csinálni, mit csináltál és mi történt
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kérjük, másold az angolul megjelenített szöveget, ahelyett, hogy lefordítanád a Te nyelvedre! If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Létezik ez a szöveg a fordítási rendszerben? Ha igen, több mint 24 órája lett lefordítva?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kérjük magyarázd el a javaslatodat pontosan és tömören, hogy amennyire lehet, könnyen érthető legyen, mire is gondolsz!
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
-
• Mit láttál a képernyőn, amikor blokkolva lettél? (Üres képernyő? A játék felületének egy részét? Hiba üzenet?)
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
-
• A szabályok melyik részét nem vette figyelembe a BGA adaptáció
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Ez a szabály áthágása látható a visszajátszásban? Ha igen, melyik lépésszámnál?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
-
• Melyik játékbeli akciót akartad csinálni, amikor a hiba előjött?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Mit akartál csinálni, hogy ezt a játékbeli akciót elindíthasd?
-
• Mi történt amikor megpróbáltad ezt (hiba üzenet, játék státusz üzenet, ...)?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
-
• A játék melyik lépésénél lépett fel a probléma? (mi volt a kiírt utasítás?)
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Mi történt amikor megpróbáltad ezt az akciót (hiba üzenet, játék státusz üzenet, ...)?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kérjük, írd le a megjelenítési hibát! If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kérjük, másold az angolul megjelenített szöveget, ahelyett, hogy lefordítanád a Te nyelvedre! If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Létezik ez a szöveg a fordítási rendszerben? Ha igen, több mint 24 órája lett lefordítva?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
-
• Kérjük magyarázd el a javaslatodat pontosan és tömören, hogy amennyire lehet, könnyen érthető legyen, mire is gondolsz!
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Mozilla v5
Bejelentés előzmények
I already have rejected similar request in the past, it seems that people are not looking to rejected request before creating a new one, so I leave this one opened. But it won't be done.
It's not so easy to do : you lose 10 points every round, you refuse to win points by agriculture level, and you let other players have agriculture very easily.
As mentioned by admitted, in 2-player, is usually suicide in high-level games; I've seen instances where a temporary 10-pt sacrifice was useful, but the pure "get babies and to heck with food" philosophy does not work well enough to beat 400's and up.
Hozzáadni valamit a jelentéshez
- Másik asztal ID / lépés ID
- az F5 megoldotta a problémát?
- Milyen gyakran jön elő a probléma? Minden alkalommal? Véletlenszerűen?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
