#34833: "Board positioning: avoid requiring scrolling where possible"
Miről szól ez a jelentés?
Mi történt? Kérünk, válassz az alábbiakból
Mi történt? Kérünk, válassz az alábbiakból
Kérjük ellenőrizd, hogy nincs-e azonos tárggyal már jelentés!
Ha igen, kérjük SZAVAZZ erre a jelentésre! A legtöbb szavazattal rendelkező jelentéssel kiemelt PRIORITÁSSAL foglalkozunk
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Részletes leírás
-
• Kérjük másold be a hiba üzenetet, amit kaptál, ha volt ilyen.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Kérjük mondd el, hogy mit szerettél volna csinálni, mit csináltál és mi történt
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Kérjük, másold az angolul megjelenített szöveget, ahelyett, hogy lefordítanád a Te nyelvedre! Ha van screenshot-od erről a bugról (ajánlott), használd a Imgur.com, hogy feltöltsd, majd másold be a linket.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Létezik ez a szöveg a fordítási rendszerben? Ha igen, több mint 24 órája lett lefordítva?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Kérjük magyarázd el a javaslatodat pontosan és tömören, hogy amennyire lehet, könnyen érthető legyen, mire is gondolsz!
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Mit láttál a képernyőn, amikor blokkolva lettél? (Üres képernyő? A játék felületének egy részét? Hiba üzenet?)
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
-
• A szabályok melyik részét nem vette figyelembe a BGA adaptáció
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Ez a szabály áthágása látható a visszajátszásban? Ha igen, melyik lépésszámnál?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Melyik játékbeli akciót akartad csinálni, amikor a hiba előjött?
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Mit akartál csinálni, hogy ezt a játékbeli akciót elindíthasd?
-
• Mi történt amikor megpróbáltad ezt (hiba üzenet, játék státusz üzenet, ...)?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
-
• A játék melyik lépésénél lépett fel a probléma? (mi volt a kiírt utasítás?)
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Mi történt amikor megpróbáltad ezt az akciót (hiba üzenet, játék státusz üzenet, ...)?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Kérjük, írd le a megjelenítési hibát! Ha van screenshot-od erről a bugról (ajánlott), használd a Imgur.com, hogy feltöltsd, majd másold be a linket.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Kérjük, másold az angolul megjelenített szöveget, ahelyett, hogy lefordítanád a Te nyelvedre! Ha van screenshot-od erről a bugról (ajánlott), használd a Imgur.com, hogy feltöltsd, majd másold be a linket.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Létezik ez a szöveg a fordítási rendszerben? Ha igen, több mint 24 órája lett lefordítva?
• Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Kérjük magyarázd el a javaslatodat pontosan és tömören, hogy amennyire lehet, könnyen érthető legyen, mire is gondolsz!
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Milyen böngészőt használsz?
Google Chrome v79
Bejelentés előzmények
I think laying our the boards in the same way as the game Lucky Numbers would be beneficial, as all of the boards are the same size and can be viewed at once without either resizing or scrolling.
Hozzáadni valamit a jelentéshez
- Másik asztal ID / lépés ID
- az F5 megoldotta a problémát?
- Milyen gyakran jön elő a probléma? Minden alkalommal? Véletlenszerűen?
- Ha van screenshot-od erről a bugról (ajánlott), használd a Imgur.com, hogy feltöltsd, majd másold be a linket.
